Advertisement

LONG-TERM ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION, WITH OR WITHOUT RADIOTHERAPY, IN LOCALLY-ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER: RESULTS FROM A PHASE III RANDOMIZED STUDY

Abstract: PD72-01
Sources of Funding: Takeda

Introduction

Data comparing androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) versus EBRT-alone have clearly demonstrated a survival benefit for the combined strategy in localized prostate cancer. Data comparing ADT alone with ADT+EBRT combinations are scarcer and this study aims to investigate oncological outcomes with long-term follow-up.

Methods

This multicenter phase III trial included 273 patients with biopsy-proven locally advanced prostate cancer (T3-4) randomly assigned to ADT alone or ADT+EBRT. Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist (leuprorelin 11.25 mg, subcutaneous) was started within seven days of randomization and continued every three months for three years in both arms. Oral flutamide (750 mg/day) was administered during the first month. The whole pelvis was treated at a dose of 46+/-2 Gy and the prostate with a boost from 20 Gy to 28 Gy. The primary objective was 5-year progresion-free Survival (PFS) according to clinical or biochemical criteria, using the ASTRO-Phoenix definition. Secondary endpoints consisted of overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), locoregional progression free survival (LPFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), time to metastatic progression, biochemical progression free survival (BPFS) and tolerance.

Results

With a median follow-up of 7.3 years, 263 patients were included in the Intent-to-treat analyses. The 8-year PFS rate was significantly higher in the ADT+EBRT arm than in the ADT-alone arm (47.9% versus 7.0%; hazard ratio: 0.27, log-rank p<0.0001). The risk of death from prostate cancer was significantly reduced in the ADT+EBRT arm as compared to the ADT-alone arm (sub-hazard ratio (SHR): 0.48; Gray’s test p=0.02). The 8-year OS rate was respectively 56.8% in the ADT-alone arm and 65.1% in the ADT+EBRT arm (log-rank p=0.43). LPFS was significantly in favor of ADT+EBRT arm (SHR = 0.61; Gray’s test p=0.01). MFS was comparable between both arms (Gray’s test p=0.88). Analysis of toxicities revealed acute lower tolerance (mainly gastro-intestinal and genito-urinary) in the ADT+EBRT arm with a gradual decrease in intensity during follow up from 6 months after the end of EBRT.

Conclusions

These long-term results confirm the oncological benefit of combining EBRT with ADT in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer.

Funding

Takeda

Authors
Paul Sargos
Nicolas Mottet
Pierre Richaud
back to top