Advertisement

Can focal therapy impact on perioperative, oncological and function outcomes in men underwent focal therapy salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy? A retrospective matched-pair comparative study

Abstract: PD56-07
Sources of Funding: None

Introduction

Salvage surgery is an option for recurrent prostate cancer(PCa) after focal therapy(FT). This is the first study to assess the impact of FT on surgical outcomes comparing salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy(S-RARP) versus primary-RARP(P-RARP). We aimed to compare the impact of FT on perioperative, oncological and functional outcomes in men underwent S-RARP versus P-RARP.

Methods

Prospective data of 2775 men underwent RARP for localized PCa from 2000 to 2016 were reviewed. Twenty-five men underwent S-RARP after FT failure(S-RARP group). Total 2750 underwent RARP as primary treatment. Matched-pair 1:2 selection of 44 out of 2750 patients by age, IPSS and IIEF5 defined P-RARP group. Primary endpoint was between-groups differences on functional outcomes. Secondary endpoint was oncological data. p<0.05 was significant.

Results

Surgical time, transfusion and complication rates were comparable(p≥0.05). Rates of continence probability[49.5%(SE 0.13) versus 62.4%(SE 0.08), p=0.8 and 73%(SE 0.14) versus 76.5%(SE 0.07), p=0.8, at 1 and 2 years, respectively] and the chance for achieving continence[HR 1.062, 95%CI 0.54-2.08, p=0.861] were comparable between-groups. Potency recovery was significant lower on S-RARP at 1 year follow-up[3±2 versus 9.22±6.55, p=0.008]. S-RARP showed significant lower rates of cumulative BCR-free survival probability[67.6%(SE 0.12) versus 95.1%(SE 0.03), p=0.001 and 56,3%(SE 0.15) versus 92,4%(SE 0.04), p=0.001, at 1 and 2 years, respectively]. S-RARP presented significant increased risk of BCR[HR 4.8, 95%CI 1.67-13.76, p=0.004]. Upstaging was an independent predictor factor for BCR on S-RARP[HR 14.65, 95%CI 1.46-146.37, p=0.022].

Conclusions

Salvage-RARP following FT failure is feasible and safe with acceptable complications rates. Patients assigned to FT should be previously advised about lower erectile recovery rates in case of a salvage surgery. Urologists may be warned about the risk of undertreatment in patients presenting failure along FT follow-up.

Funding

None

Authors
Igor Nunes-Silva
Eric Barret
Victor Srougi
Mohammed Baghdadi
Silvia Garcia-Barreras
Paolo Capogrosso
Gregorie Rembeyo
Ariê Carneiro
Rafael Sanchez-Salas
François Rozet
Marc Galiano
Xavier Cathelineau
back to top