Advertisement

Salvage Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy after Primary Radiation or Ablation Treatment: What have we learned? Assessing the Learning Curve in Terms of Morbidity, Oncological and Functional Outcomes.

Abstract: PD51-06
Sources of Funding: None

Introduction

Among the different approaches to treat recurrent prostate cancer only 2% of the patients undergo salvage RP because, despite good cancer control, historically, salvage RP has been associated with significant morbidity and poor functional outcomes_x000D_ _x000D_ To analyze the learning curve in terms of morbidity, oncological and functional outcomes in Salvage Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (sRARP) patients in a single surgeon tertiary-referral center._x000D_

Methods

In our IRB approved retrospective analysis >9000 patients underwent RARP for localized prostate cancer (PCa) by a single surgeon (V.P) between January 2008 and March 2016. Among those patients, 80 underwent sRARP due to a local recurrence after primary treatment. Within the current learning curve analysis, all of the 80 sRARP patients were then sub-divided in 4 equal groups of 20 consecutive patients based on date of surgery. Functional and oncological outcomes were measured at 12 months post-sRARP in Groups 1-3 only, as group 4 had limited follow-up. Potency was defined as the ability to achieve a successful erection with penetration over 50% of the time, while full and 0-2 continence was defined as 0 pads and ?2 pads/day, respectively.

Results

Preoperatively; a trend to decrease was observed through the 4 groups in terms of operative time (137 to 125 min; p=0.022), estimated blood loss (137 to 117ml; p=0.346) and catheterization time (16.95 to 12.2; p=0.182). Radiographic anastomotic leaks trended towards a decline (from 50% to 20%; p=0.126), while morbidity remained stable thorough the groups (5%; p>0.05). Biochemical failure was similar between 3 groups (30%, 31.3%, and 21.4% respectively: p=0.797) and all patients were alive at 12 months of follow up. Potency rates tended to increase from 10% in GI to 28.6% in GIII (p=0.378). Full and 0-2pads continence rates were similar among the groups (50-57.9%; p=0.859 and 60-68.4%: p=0.860 respectively). Lastly; a clinical reduction in time to continence was observed from GI to GIII (112.3 to 71.28 days; p=0.393).

Conclusions

The learning curve over the course of ~8 years demonstrated a decrease in operative time and suggested a trend for decreases in intraoperative blood loss, catheterization time and anastomotic leaks, while nerve sparing increased significantly through the groups. Therefore, a slightly higher potency rate and lower time to continence through the learning curve was shown. However, longer term studies are needed to confirm these results.

Funding

None

Authors
Xavier Bonet
Gabriel Ogaya
Tracey Woodlief
Eduardo Hernández-Cardona
Hariharan Ganapathi
Travis Rogers
Rafael Coelho
Bernardo Rocco
Vipul Patel
back to top