Advertisement

Identifying the optimal candidate for salvage lymph node dissection for nodal recurrence of prostate cancer: results from a large, multi-institutional analysis

Abstract: PD15-09
Sources of Funding: none

Introduction

Salvage lymph node dissection (SLND) represents a possible treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) patients experiencing nodal recurrence after local treatment. We aimed at identifying the optimal candidates for SLND based on pre-operative characteristics.

Methods

The study included 538 patients who experienced PSA rise and nodal recurrence after RP who underwent SLND at eight tertiary referral centres. Lymph node recurrence was documented by positron emission tomography / computed tomography (PET/CT) scan using either 11C-choline or 68Ga-prostate-specific-membrane-antigen (PSMA) ligand. The study outcome was systemic progression (skeletal and / or visceral metastasis). Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to develop a predictive model for the study outcome. Predictors consisted of patient age, PSA level at SLND, PSA doubling time (PSADT), diagnostic tracer (11C-choline vs. PSMA), site of nodal positive imaging (pelvic vs. retroperitoneal vs. both), and number of positive spots at PET/CT. Multivariable-derived coefficients were used to develop a novel risk-calculator.

Results

imaging was positive in pelvic, retroperitoneal, and pelvic + retroperitoneal regions in 400 (15%), 58 (11%), and 80 (15%) patients. The number of positive spots was 1, 2, and ≥3 in 277 (52%), 120 (22%), and 141 (26%) patients. At a median follow-up of 44 months, 88 (16%) patients experienced systemic progression. At multivariable analysis, age (HR: 0.96; p=0.046), PSA at SLND (HR: 1.02; p=0.006), PSADT (HR: 0.99; p=0.001), PSMA tracer (HR: 0.11; p=0.003), positive imaging in both pelvic and retroperitoneal regions (HR: 1.69; p=0.02), and ≥3 positive spots (HR: 1.71; p=0.01) were significantly associated with M1b-c stage. The multivariable model had a predictive accuracy of 75%. Three pre-operative groups were defined based on the risk calculator: low- (<33%), intermediate- (33-66%), and high-risk (>66%). Distant metastasis-free survival at 3 years was significantly different among the three groups (3% vs. 10% vs. 39%, p<0.0001).

Conclusions

We reported the largest series available of patients treated with SLND. At mid-term follow-up, roughly 15% of men developed systemic progression after surgery. We developed a risk calculator based on pre-operative characteristics to discern patients who would benefit the most from SLND from other patients who should be spared from the side effects of SLND.

Funding

none

Authors
Nicola Fossati
Nazareno Suardi
Giorgio Gandaglia
Armando Stabile
Michele Colicchia
R. Jeffrey Karnes
Friederike Haidl
David Pfister
Daniel Porres
Axel Heidenreich
Christian Gratzke
Annika Herlemann
Christian Stief
Antonino Battaglia
Wouter Everaerts
Steven Joniau
Hein Van Poppel
Alexey V. Aksenov
Daniar K. Osmonov
Klaus-Peter Juenemann
ADL Abreu
Fabio Almeida
C. Fay
Inderbir Gill
Alexandre Mottrie
Francesco Montorsi
Alberto Briganti
back to top