Advertisement

Oncological Outcomes of Salvage Radical Prostatectomy: a multicentre series of 243 patients.

Login to Access Video or Poster Abstract: MP64-02
Sources of Funding: None

Introduction

Salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) represents a valid treatment option with curative intent, in men with biochemical recurrence (BCR). We evaluated oncological outcomes of a contemporary series of sRP.

Methods

Three hundred seventy-six men with biochemical recurrence (BCR), who underwent sRP between 2000 and 2015 at 13 Tertiary referral centres, were retrospectively analysed. Age, PSA, clinical and pathological TNM, primary and pre-sRP biopsy and sRP gleason score (GS), surgical margins, imaging type and positive sites, lymphadenectomy template used, number of lymph-nodes removed and positive, ASA score and ECOG performance status and use of hormonal treatment (HT) were collected for each patient. Exclusion criteria were a follow up <12 months or unavailability of the data. Continuous variables were tested for normal distribution and then compared using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test; differences in categorical variables were assessed by Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests.

Results

Two hundred forty-three men were included. Primary treatments were external beam radiation therapy in 69.5%, cryotherapy in 3.7%, HIFU in 4.1%, brachytherapy in 21.4% and other primary treatments in 1.2% of the patients. Mean PSA and age pre-sRP were 6.32 ±8.23ng/mL and 64.7 ±8.35 years, respectively. Pre-operatively, 1 men had radiological evidence of retroperitoneal nodal involvement, no extra-nodal metastasis were present, 88 men (37.13%) were on HT whereas 15 (6.22%) had castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). ASA score was 3 in 63 (26%) patients. A super-extended lymphadenectomy, including retroperitoneal nodes was performed in 6 cases (2.49%). At final pathology, 85 patients (38.6%) had a GS ≥8, whereas local extra-prostatic extension (T stage≥3) was diagnosed in 118 patients (48.96%). Surgical margins were positive in 89 patients (37.09%). Mean number of nodes removed and positive were 11.6 ±9.27 and 0.68 ±2.55, respectively. After a median follow up of 36.8 months (IQ range 22.7-61.4), BCR had occurred in 104 patients (44.07%) and 16 patients (6.5%) developed CRPC. Overall survival (OS) was 92.95% and cancer specific survival (CSS) 95.85%.

Conclusions

Promising oncological outcomes can be achieved by salvage radical prostatectomy. Although significant rates of BCR and positive surgical margins are observed, OS and CSS prove relatively high on a short-medium term follow-up. To validate the present findings, longer follow-up and higher number of patients are needed.

Funding

None

Authors
Giancarlo Marra
Paolo Gontero
Paolo Alessio
Marco Oderda
Michele Brattoli
Giorgio Calleris
Anna Palazzetti
Francesca Pisano
Antonino Battaglia
Stefania Munegato
Bruno Frea
Fernando Munoz
Claudia Filippini
Estefania Linares
Rafael Sanchez-Salas
Sanchia Goonewardene
Prokar Dasgupta
Declan Cahill
Ben Challacombe
Rick Popert
David Gillatt
Raj Persad
Juan Palou
Steven Joniau
Salvatore Smelzo
Thierry Piechaud
Alexandre De La Taille
Morgan Roupret
Simone Albissini
Roland Van Velthoven
Alessandro Morlacco
Sharma Vidit
Giorgio Gandaglia
Alexander Mottrie
Joseph Smith
Shreyas Joshi
Gabriel Fiscus
Robert Jeffrey Karnes
back to top