Advertisement

Over Half of Contemporary Clinical Gleason 8 on Prostate Biopsy are Downgraded at Radical Prostatectomy

Login to Access Video or Poster Abstract: MP33-18
Sources of Funding: none

Introduction

Accurate biopsy Gleason scoring is critical for the proper treatment of prostate cancer (PC). Here, we present an alarming discrepancy between PC diagnosed as high-risk pathology on biopsy and their actual pathology after radical prostatectomy (RP).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 1034 men who underwent open RP by a single surgeon between 2004 and 2015. 112 men were diagnosed with Gleason 8 pathology on prostate biopsy. We excluded 5 patients whose RPs were aborted and 4 whose neoadjuvant treatments prevented proper Gleason scoring. Biopsy and RP pathology were compared in aggregate and over one-year time intervals. Chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test, and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test were used for statistical analysis.

Results

61.1% (63/103) of clinical Gleason 8 diagnoses were downgraded on surgical pathology after RP, with 60 specimens being downgraded to Gleason 7 (Gleason 4+3 n=39; Gleason 3+4 n=21). There were significant in-group differences among the one-year cohorts (p<0.02), with increased pathology downgrading over time that includes an 84.2% (32/38) downgrade rate from 2012-2015. Pathology downgrading is significantly associated with lower PSA at biopsy (median 6.9 vs 9.4 ng/ml, p<0.01), decreased tumor percentage (median 12 vs 15%, p<0.03), and lower percentage of positive margins (47.6 vs 66.7%, p<0.04). It is borderline associated with lower percentage of seminal vesicle invasion (11.1 vs 25.6%, p<0.06) and extracapsular extension (49.2 vs 69.2%, p<0.08). Neoadjuvant treatment (14/103), race, age, and clinical staging were not significantly associated with pathology downgrading.

Conclusions

The large, increasing percentage of pathology downgrading implies a high rate of over-diagnosis of Gleason 8 scores on biopsy, potentially leading to suboptimal treatment strategies and much patient distress. Our study adds great urgency to the efforts refining PC diagnostic techniques.

Funding

none

Authors
Tracy Han
Ilhan Gokhan
Ghalib Jibara
Robert Qi
Judd Moul
back to top